Showing posts with label article. Show all posts
Showing posts with label article. Show all posts

Friday, 9 July 2010

Making the Most of Opportunities

There are basic and quite specific methods of locating, and then catching, a particular species of fish. For instance, to catch tench, we know they generally prefer the weedy margins on many lakes and meres; that they feed mainly in the early morning; and that if we present a popular tench bait such as sweetcorn on the bottom in such an area we have a good chance of catching one. Another instance is that we know bream feed along well established routes, and that if we leger a worm somewhere along one of these routes, we have a good chance of catching a bream.

Of course, that is an extremely simplified version of possible events - if only it were that easy, especially when big fish are the target. But what I’ve said is, at least, basically true, and anyhow, the gist is that if we stick to proven formulae for long enough it usually all comes together sooner or later. But there comes a time when we have to throw the text books through the window, for sometimes we are presented with an opportunity that demands we forget about the usual conventional method and try to catch a fish with whatever means seems best at the time. What I’ve found over the years is that when the time comes to grasp an unexpected opportunity of catching a big fish, it is usually with a method and/or a bait that you wouldn’t normally be using for that species, in that water.

The best thing I can do is tell you what happened on a couple of occasions when I’ve been presented with an unexpected opportunity.

Bream
Some time ago a friend and I fished a local lake for big bream. As far as I know we did everything right, approaching the fishing with methods that had been successful on many other occasions. We arrived in the evening in plenty of time to get settled in for a night session, and to claim a favourite swim that was currently very productive. We used the boat to place a marker in the swim, fed it with groundbait, feeder maggots (squats), maggot and caster, and then set the tackle up on the platform. Two rods each, tackled up with 4lb lines and 14’s hooks, rigged in the usual paternoster style, one with swimfeeder and the other with straight bomb, were set up on rod-pods with bite alarms and butt indicators, and then we sat down to await the magic hours. These were from 11pm to first light, with 12am to 3am being the real hot period. But it was not to be, we didn’t have a bite all night.

At 8am we started cooking breakfast, the time when any bream action is usually over and thoughts of going home begin to enter your thoughts. The cloudy, warm night had turned into a sunny, more than warm day, even at that time in the morning. It was going to be extremely hot. The surface was flat calm, and the sky had only a few wisps of cloud drifting across the pale blue backdrop. It wasn’t a fishing day, more like a sunbathing, picnic type of day.

As the last remnants of bacon sandwiches were washed down with a cup of hot tea we saw the first black back slice through the surface, a hump that could only belong to a big bream. It was 60yds away too, and the ripple that emanated from that rolling bream had hardly flattened out when another bream broke surface two or three metres to the right. Then another, this time a few yards farther away and still heading away from us. But by that time, without saying a word to each other, we were drawing float rods from holdalls like arrows from a quiver. We knew exactly what we had to do. After all, it wasn’t the first time such an opportunity had presented itself.

Within a few minutes we had tackled up with sliding floats, using 3lb main lines, and 2.5lb hook lengths to 16’s hooks. These were loaded into the boat, along with a landing net, bait boxes of maggot, caster and worms, seats, catapult, and tackle boxes. We rowed across the mere to a spot where, according to past experience, the bream would head for next. It was a race to get there before they did, to make sure we could drop the mud-weights, fire in some bait, and be settled and waiting for them with the minimum of disturbance.

This was one of those times when things worked out exactly according to plan.  Every few minutes we spotted a bream rolling, and each time they were closer, until one rolled close enough to my friend's float to cause it to sway in the swell from the roll. My heart missed more than one beat when we knew the bream had entered the trap. Would they succumb to my single redworm tipped with maggot, or my friends single redworm tipped with caster?

They were coming into the swim from my friend's side, and his float was the first to slide across the surface and then disappear.  The bream fought well on the relatively light tackle, but luckily it kited to one side and then in a big semi-circle and was landed behind the boat, away from the swim. Even so, I couldn’t help but wonder if the hooking of that fish was going to be enough to spook those that remained. It was a beautiful bream that my friend cradled in his arms just before he slipped it back. It weighed 5kg. But I didn’t have long to dwell on it, for my own float shot under, and my tightening of the line met with that inimitable thumping that all big bream men know and love so much.

It had been less than an hour since we had moored the boat in that swim and ambushed the bream, and in that short space of time we had landed two in double figures, a better result than the night session that had produced nothing more than two line bites. Seeing those bream roll had presented an opportunity, and one that had to be taken advantage of with simple float tackle, for the high-tech bite alarms, rod-pods and other sophisticated gear was out of place in that type of situation, where an attack had to be mounted from a boat at very short notice.

Barbel
Another opportunity presented itself during a visit to a nearby river a few years ago. I intended to fish for chub into darkness, that magic time when chub come alive. I’d arrived far too early though, and had two to three hours to kill before dusk fell, and although it was a mild late autumn day, with the river running as clear as tap water, I decided to tackle up a float rod and fish for small fish for a couple of hours. I threaded a 5lb line through the 13ft match rod (it was the lightest reel line I had with me, with not knowing I’d be fishing for small fish) and tied on a 4lb hook length. Hook was a 16’s, which was the smallest I could get away with for bread fishing, which was the only remotely suitable bait for small fish I had with me. Certainly better than the lobworms, luncheon meat and cheese paste I’d brought along for chub. Float was a straight waggler, bulk shotted at mid-depth, apart from a single shot about a foot from the hook.

I mashed up two slices of bread and sat for about five minutes, just feeding tiny pieces into the head of the 3ft deep glide, hoping to get the small fish well on feed before I attempted to catch any (and it all passed the time away to bring closer the fishing I really wanted to do). Before I picked up the rod to send a bait down I saw a white flash at the tail end of the swim. Great, I thought, they’re onto the bait. So I pinched a tiny piece of flake around the shank of the 16’s and delivered it to the swim. As my float reached the tail end of the swim, when I was obviously looking in that direction, I had a clear view of the next white flash to appear there. That was no small fish. Chub, I thought, and it looked a good size. I retrieved the tackle, and switched the 16’s for a 10’s, tied direct to the 5lb line, and then fed a few more pieces of mash before I tried another cast.

I soon realised they were not chub, they were barbel, lovely bronze barbel, flashing their white bellies as they turned over to get their underslung mouths to the bread that was floating down just a few centimetres under the surface. Why they refused the particles that had sunk, and were trundling along the bottom I’ll never know. Perhaps it was more fun to perform somersaults to get at the bread higher in the water. Who says fish don’t know how to enjoy themselves?

I slid the float down to fish just 2ft deep, and then pushed all the bulk shotting right under the float. The bottom shot remained where it was, which meant it was now mid-way between float and hook. I pinched a piece of flake onto the shank of the hook, and then fed a few more small pieces of mashed bread into the swim, following them down immediately with my hooked offering. It worked like a charm, the barbel were coming up from the bottom so fast to intercept the loose mash they didn’t have time to spot any difference between the loose feed and my hook bait. In the next hour or so, before they either went off feed, or were spooked due to me catching a few of them, I took six barbel from a little over 8lb to a best fish of 11lb. My chub fishing suffered later though, for I had used up all the bread I had with me, and I was certain I would have caught more than the three I did manage to catch if I’d had bread to offer them. Who knows? But I wasn’t complaining.

These days I go better prepared for the unexpected, rarely being without a float rod, and usually with a good selection of baits and various bits and pieces of tackle. You just never know what you’re going to come across, and it’s as well to be prepared for almost anything. The trouble is, all my efforts to lighten the load I carry are more difficult, for everything I pick up with a view to leaving it at home are met with the thought: better not, you never know just what you might............................


Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, 8 July 2010

Which Camera for Anglers?

I don't intend giving any advice in this article about any camera other than a digital. Film cameras went out not too many years after split cane rods and while both will, respectively, take good pictures and catch good fish, neither are as good at doing the job as the modern tool. The end product will be more or less the same, but producing the end product with the ancient gear will be so much more laborious. Both film cameras and split cane rods are for those who are expert in either photography and fishing, or both, and get their kicks from reliving and romanticising about the past. If that's what turns you on then great, go and enjoy it, but it's not for me and therefore I'm not the right person to write about it.

Self-Take Photography

Anglers are often loners and what they need in a camera is to easily be able to take shots of themselves with a fish. Please refer to this article, 'Fishing & Photography', for more details on this topic.

Although the articles mentions the Canon G11 compact as the best there is for this job, it's not a cheap camera, even for a compact. However, browse the internet, particularly eBay, for the previous Canon 'G' models and you may get one at the budget you want to spend. A G11 or similar on a Gorrillapod, as seen in the picture left, is a great piece of kit for self-take photography.

Making the Right Choice

Camera phone, compact or DSLR (Digital Single Lens Reflex)? That's the big question and the answer depends on what you're prepared to spend, what you're going to use the pictures for, where you fish and if you fish alone or with a pal. All those things are significant when making the final choice.

Make a list and consider the following:


Marker FloatImage by Graham Marsden via Flickr
•    What do want a camera for; what are you going to do with the shots you take? For web and small prints you need only a cheap compact or even a mobile phone camera, unless you're an photo enthusiast.
•    Number of megapixels (but see below - 'The Megapixel Myth')
•    Do you want a simple point and shoot camera or do you want a degree of control?
•    Do you want a viewfinder, a screen, or both?
•    If a screen, then how big?
•    Is size and weight of camera an important factor to you?
•    Do you want anti-camera shake, called variously image stability, vibration reduction, etc.
•    Do you want optical zoom or digital zoom? Digital zoom merely enlarges what you've already got by increasing the size of the dots and decreasing the quality of the shot and can be done more easily in post processing software. Most experienced photographers would never use digital zoom.
•    Do you want the camera to be able to take video?
•    Do you want to take pics of yourself as easily as possible? The best type are the swivel screen with remote control.
•    How much do you want to spend?

Lots of questions there, so write them down or print this off and tick those points that are important to you.


The Megapixel Myth


Before making your final choice let's get one myth out of way: multi megapixels in a digital camera are not what the camera manufacturers would lead you to believe. Advertisements imply that 8 megapixels are always better than 5 megapixels and so on. They're important yes, but they are not the be-all and end-all of producing a good shot. Lots of megapixels are good depending on various other factors, such as the camera’s lens, circuitry and sensor, as well as your skill with lighting, composition and the camera’s controls.
A megapixel is one million coloured dots in the picture and it seems to make sense that more megapixels adds up to a sharper photo. The reality though, is that it could just be a poor photo made up of more dots.

Typically, photographic pixels are recorded to an image sensor, a CCD (Charge Coupled Device), and as manufacturers cram more pixels on a given sensor, those pixels need to be smaller to be able to fit. Larger pixels mean better light-gathering capability which leads to better low-light performance, better colour accuracy, and in some cases, better dynamic range. Sensors come in a few different sizes: Full frame (24 x 36mm), APS-C (17 x 25mm), Four-thirds (13.5 x 18mm), and even smaller sensors on compact models.
So, it's worth repeating: cramming more and more pixels on a sensor just leads to a reduction in pixel size and a depreciation in image quality as it inevitably reduces the pixels ability to gather light, and reduces its sensitivity.
Playing Fish 02Image by Graham Marsden via Flickr

This is why, given equal quality in lens, circuitry and photographer's skill, a DSLR will almost always produce a better picture than that of a compact camera. They may have the same number of megapixels, or even more on the compact, but those megapixels on the compact will be smaller to enable them to fit on its small sensor.

The bottom line is this; 6 megapixels is easily enough for most photographers. With 6mp you can print up to A4 without any noticeable loss of quality and can show your photos on a PC screen, or on the internet, with no noticeable difference from the pictures taken with a 12mp camera. Yes, I do have a 12mp camera but that's mainly due to the camera I wanted having all the other bells and whistles I wanted, that just happened to have 12mp. In the last year or so I've gone from the £2000 full frame Nikon D700 to the £650.00 Nikon D90 and I can honestly say, for the photography I do and where I view it, I can't tell any difference whatsoever.

It can't be repeated often enough: if you just want to publish pictures on the internet and make small prints up to about 5" x 7" then a decent mobile phone camera or a cheap compact will do the job quite adequately. Only invest in an expensive compact or a DSLR if you're a photography enthusiast or you want to produce big prints or publish your pictures in a magazine.



Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, 29 June 2010

From the Archives - Fishing is Fishing

Maybe six or seven years ago, for that one year, most of my attention had been aimed at carp and pike, temporarily relieving several waters of over 50 reasonably big carp to almost 30lb, and roughly the same number of double figure pike, including several over 20lb.

Compare the fight of even the most sluggish of those fish, to the feeble flapping of a 6oz dace (which is not a bad sized dace) and you have a better parable than David and Goliath. So how is it I can still enjoy fishing for dace and other small species like roach as much, sometimes more, than those huge - in comparison - carp and pike?

The simple truth is that I do, and just as I have great difficulty sleeping the night before a fishing session for carp and pike, my insomnia is no less the night before a visit to the Dane or Dove for a few hours after the dace. To me, fishing is fishing, and I'm as addicted to watching a stick float steal through a smooth glide on a little river, as I am to watching a pike float bob across the heaving waves of a big lake.

World Record Common CarpImage by Graham Marsden via Flickr

Of course, there is a different kind of thrill to seeing the menacing jaws of a big pike slide over the edge of your landing net, to the thrill of slipping the net under the glistening body of a dainty dace. Where pike and carp provide a raw, macho kind of excitement, more related to the 'Ramboesque' angler, dace, and their ilk, provide the gentle, 'Morse' kind of thrill. The amount of enjoyment derived from each, however, can very well be equal.

All of which probably sounds like a load of rubbish to those carp and pike anglers who have never fished for anything else, or rate their success in no other terms but that of hard fights and heavy weights of individual fish.

One can make a fair comparison only if you indulge in all aspects of the sport, from slinging out a boilie on a hefty bolt rig, to side-casting a single caster on a 4 No. 4 stick, otherwise it is extremely difficult to understand what the 'other half' sees in their particular poison. Fortunately, I do enjoy all aspects of coarse and fly fishing.

I'm lucky, really, in that I can indulge in, and enjoy, the kind of fishing that suits my mood at the time. If I'm feeling lazy, and don't fancy any great activity, even to the point of not wanting to mix any groundbait, or prepare bait of any description, I can elect to grab a bag of shelf-life boilies and fish for carp. I need do no more than take a pair of made-up rods (which can include boilies already hung on the hair rigs) set up a rod-pod with bite alarms, hang on a couple of stringers of boilies, and I'm fishing. With no more to do than lie back on my bedchair and relax. Take off the boilies and substitute the end rigs for snap tackles baited with deadbaits straight from the freezer, and I'm piking in the same lazy way.

Two very handy methods of fishing for those who don't want anything very demanding, or who want to catch up on some reading. Pick a very difficult water where you are not likely to get many bites to disturb either your sleep or your reading and you can have a really idle time. And, of course, always with a chance of picking up that huge fish from such a difficult water, which you can enter in all the competitions, possibly showering you with cash and tackle, and headlines that describe you as a brilliant angler. You can chuckle all the way to the bank and tackle shed.
What a Bite!Image by Graham Marsden via Flickr

While I've got my cynic's hat on: Generally speaking, the less I do, and the more time I have to spend at the waterside doing nothing but casting occasionally, and lazing around a hell of a lot, the more chance I have of catching a fish that would attract the attention I've just described. It's a sad fact that the angler who fishes a river with float and light tackle, and makes a good catch as a result of a hell of a lot of skill and hard work, may never receive any recognition all his life. Right, off with the cynic's hat.

So, in a lazy mood I can spend time at the waterside doing little more than occasionally baiting and casting, possibly catching a few fish, getting a nice tan in the right weather, doing a little reading, and probably a lot of resting. I enjoy that as much as anything when I'm in that frame of mind. And I'm quite prepared to put up with the long periods of inactivity when I'm fishing a water that demands that kind of approach and holds fish that make the wait worthwhile. My problem, if that is the right way of describing it, is that I can take only so much of the type of fishing that involves a lot of doing nothing. Perhaps it's a fault of mine.

So when I've had enough of the sitting and waiting I may decide to go for a spell of feeder fishing for barbel, which, if you do it properly, involves a lot of casting to keep bait going through the swim, and keeping your hand on, or at least near to, the rod, ready to react to that sudden lunge of the rod tip when a barbel takes off with the bait.

An even more active kind of fishing is one I've already mentioned; float fishing on a river, for this involves constantly feeding, casting and retrieving. And even the bit between casting and retrieving demands constant control of the float through mending the line, holding back when necessary, and all the while being ready to react to the smallest bite.

Many times I will choose to fish in a way that is somewhere between the two extremes I've described, which depends of course on the water rather than the species. For instance, I may elect to fish for tench or bream, not on a fishery as difficult as, say, Queenford Lagoon appears to be, but where the fish are reasonably big, though not in the potential record-breaking class, and where bites can be logged by the session rather than by the season.

These sessions could involve bite alarms and bedchairs, but demand more activity as far as feeding the swim is concerned, which may be on the little and often principle (relatively speaking) and frequent casting, particularly if swimfeeders are being used.

Another variation is float fishing from a boat for quality fish. Constant feeding, and casting (when the fish are taking on-the-drop) makes this type of fishing very active at times, and a great change from land-based fishing. Although it can be pain when you fancy a brief walk to stretch your legs and your name isn't Jesus Christ. And relieving yourself can be a work of art.

Not My Biggest Fish But...Image by Graham Marsden via Flickr
So, you can enjoy yourself catching lots of small fish, just as you can catching the odd big fish. The answer lies in how much you put into it. If you approach float fishing for roach and dace, say, with the attitude that you shouldn't be there, but should be on the banks of a big gravel pit waiting for the alarm to go off, signalling a run from a big carp or pike, then of course you won't enjoy it. But if you realise - or, rather, accept - that catching a net of roach or dace demands a lot of skill, and needs to be worked at, and put everything you've got into catching them, then you will come away from that session with a tremendous feeling of satisfaction if you're successful. Or a determination to succeed next time if you're not successful.

Equally, if you normally only fish for nets of smaller fish, you should try to catch big fish with the attitude that it need not be all about sitting and waiting an age for a bite, but can reflect how much effort you put into swim choice (location) prebaiting (possibly) water craft in general, and good bait presentation.

Don't take the stance, as so many do, that your type of fishing is the only type of fishing worth doing. At least not until you've tried it. With the right attitude of course.

Enhanced by Zemanta