Showing posts with label fishing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fishing. Show all posts

Wednesday, 14 July 2010

Eee Lad, These Young 'uns

I told my 15 year old grandson Calum about the great day I had on Border Fisheries, fishing the margin pole with Eric, Ed and Jon. Course, he couldn't wait to go and as it happened he had a day off on Monday from his work experience from school.

It gave a false impression though, for they proved much more difficult to tempt with hookbait than they had last Friday. The several degrees overnight drop in temperature didn't help, nor the incessant rain that at times pounded on the surface like a million fingers beating a drum - which is just what I imagine it would sound like to a fish. No wonder it puts them off their snapping!



So although it did nothing but persist it down from the minute we got up to the minute we got home we did have a very enjoyable, if wet, day.

Pole FightImage by Graham Marsden via Flickr
There was no one else on the lake (probably nobody else daft enough to venture out) so I put Calum in one of the swims where we'd had that good day on Friday, and helped him set up. I didn't have to do much as he's got the hang of this pole fishing now. I showed him just how close to the edge we were fishing, throwing in a handful of micro-pellets just six inches from the boards, and blow me if two or three carp weren't swirling and scoffing the pellets within two minutes!


No matter, we caught a dozen or so carp each (and I had my first tench from the water) including a couple of low doubles and one or two F1s, plus a few nice rudd on Sonu Baits new Fibre Paste which I'm very impressed with. But more about that later when I've given it a more thorough trial.

I told Calum not to strike at all, even if the float was sailing away, for most of the time they're line bites when you're fishing the margins in extremely shallow water and you end up hooking nothing or foul-hooking a fish, and almost certainly scaring the fish out of the swim for a short spell or more.

Course, these young 'uns don't always listen and he spent the first 15 minutes or so hooking nowt.
"I've told you," I said, "when it's a proper bite from a carp the elastic will be flying out before you can react. Just leave it, no matter how good the bite looks, and the carp will hook itself."

So he resisted striking, carried on trickling the micro pellets in, and and within a few minutes was playing his first fish of the day, a decent carp of about 8 - 9lb.

So that was another good day, with my only real problem getting him to pack up and go home.


Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, 11 July 2010

Fun Day on the Pole

There was me, Eric, Ed and Jon, down at Border Fisheries for a spot of explosive fishing via the margin pole. Along with, of course, a good English breakfast, some cruel banter, and plenty of laughs; all adding up to a great day out.

With the lack of rain the water was still low, probably a foot down on normal level, which meant that margin fishing right in the margins, no more than a foot out, was in water no more than a foot deep. In fact, Jon and Eric were fishing about 9 inches deep. Sounds ridiculous I know, considering the carp we were fishing for average 7 - 10lb. The water barely covers their backs when they patrol round the margin and then start digging into the feed we've introduced.

We caught the odd fish nice and steadily for the first couple of hours or so and then the carp really got their bibs on as they found the food traps we'd put down for them. I spent some time taking photographs and helping Eric (who has yet to master the margin pole) but that's part of my enjoyment. Jon in particular was doing really well on his Shimano Beastmaster Extreme margin pole and Ed landed a barbel that he first thought was a bigger than average carp. How do these stillwater barbel manage to look so fit and fight so well considering they're essentially river fish and have no right to live in stillwater? Well, not according to some.

Jon managed to break the top section of his pole through leaning on it with his elbow and had to change to a waggler rod, both me and Ed managed to get broke off on a big fish and had the indignity of seeing the elastic twang back into the pole with a loud thwack! (No, we don't make a habit of getting broken, but it does happen very occasionally). And Eric had a carp so heavy it made him break wind as he lifted it from the water, causing a pair of pigeons to fly off from a nearby tree with a rapid flutter of wings. And I don't blame them, he frightens us at times.

We had a great day and Ed and Jon were still catching as me and Eric left a little earlier.

It's not rocket science

Now this margin pole fishing on prolific fisheries like those down at Border Fisheries isn't rocket science. You don't need to be a master angler to work out how to catch them. But we weren't there to study for any degrees in angling and we vary our approach through a wide range of legering and float fishing methods just so we're not doing the same thing week in and week out. You know, like many specialist carp anglers who fish with two rods, bolt rigs, bite alarms and boilies, in the same swim on the same water week after week after week.

 
What's the essential difference? The specialist spends a lot more time at the waterside, catches fewer but bigger fish, and waits a lot longer between bites.

 
Is that a knock at specialist carp anglers? Not on your life, for I'm one myself from time to time, but too many specialist anglers spend far too much time knocking commercial fishery anglers, or pleasure anglers who catch lots of smaller fish, from that aloof and lofty perch they've built that suggests, to them at least, that what they do is soooooooo superior to what anyone else does.

Get a life I say, and just enjoy how you fish, however it is, and leave the other guy to enjoy how he fishes. You're not doing each other any harm are you? In fact, if we all wanted to fish the same waters in the same way, there wouldn't be room for all of us. So draw your horns in and get on with enjoying how you like to fish, and accept the fact that one man's fish is another man's poisson chat.


The next time you get the urge to knock commercials or a club water with platforms and easy access, take a look at the picture of Eric to the left. He's aged 71 and has Parkinson's disease, and if it wasn't for commercial fisheries and waters like Border Fisheries, he would no longer be able to enjoy his life-long love of angling. And that applies to thousands of elderly or disabled anglers who are unable to fish anywhere that doesn't have easy access, easy fishing and comfortable swims.

Would you deny them that?




Enhanced by Zemanta



Friday, 9 July 2010

Making the Most of Opportunities

There are basic and quite specific methods of locating, and then catching, a particular species of fish. For instance, to catch tench, we know they generally prefer the weedy margins on many lakes and meres; that they feed mainly in the early morning; and that if we present a popular tench bait such as sweetcorn on the bottom in such an area we have a good chance of catching one. Another instance is that we know bream feed along well established routes, and that if we leger a worm somewhere along one of these routes, we have a good chance of catching a bream.

Of course, that is an extremely simplified version of possible events - if only it were that easy, especially when big fish are the target. But what I’ve said is, at least, basically true, and anyhow, the gist is that if we stick to proven formulae for long enough it usually all comes together sooner or later. But there comes a time when we have to throw the text books through the window, for sometimes we are presented with an opportunity that demands we forget about the usual conventional method and try to catch a fish with whatever means seems best at the time. What I’ve found over the years is that when the time comes to grasp an unexpected opportunity of catching a big fish, it is usually with a method and/or a bait that you wouldn’t normally be using for that species, in that water.

The best thing I can do is tell you what happened on a couple of occasions when I’ve been presented with an unexpected opportunity.

Bream
Some time ago a friend and I fished a local lake for big bream. As far as I know we did everything right, approaching the fishing with methods that had been successful on many other occasions. We arrived in the evening in plenty of time to get settled in for a night session, and to claim a favourite swim that was currently very productive. We used the boat to place a marker in the swim, fed it with groundbait, feeder maggots (squats), maggot and caster, and then set the tackle up on the platform. Two rods each, tackled up with 4lb lines and 14’s hooks, rigged in the usual paternoster style, one with swimfeeder and the other with straight bomb, were set up on rod-pods with bite alarms and butt indicators, and then we sat down to await the magic hours. These were from 11pm to first light, with 12am to 3am being the real hot period. But it was not to be, we didn’t have a bite all night.

At 8am we started cooking breakfast, the time when any bream action is usually over and thoughts of going home begin to enter your thoughts. The cloudy, warm night had turned into a sunny, more than warm day, even at that time in the morning. It was going to be extremely hot. The surface was flat calm, and the sky had only a few wisps of cloud drifting across the pale blue backdrop. It wasn’t a fishing day, more like a sunbathing, picnic type of day.

As the last remnants of bacon sandwiches were washed down with a cup of hot tea we saw the first black back slice through the surface, a hump that could only belong to a big bream. It was 60yds away too, and the ripple that emanated from that rolling bream had hardly flattened out when another bream broke surface two or three metres to the right. Then another, this time a few yards farther away and still heading away from us. But by that time, without saying a word to each other, we were drawing float rods from holdalls like arrows from a quiver. We knew exactly what we had to do. After all, it wasn’t the first time such an opportunity had presented itself.

Within a few minutes we had tackled up with sliding floats, using 3lb main lines, and 2.5lb hook lengths to 16’s hooks. These were loaded into the boat, along with a landing net, bait boxes of maggot, caster and worms, seats, catapult, and tackle boxes. We rowed across the mere to a spot where, according to past experience, the bream would head for next. It was a race to get there before they did, to make sure we could drop the mud-weights, fire in some bait, and be settled and waiting for them with the minimum of disturbance.

This was one of those times when things worked out exactly according to plan.  Every few minutes we spotted a bream rolling, and each time they were closer, until one rolled close enough to my friend's float to cause it to sway in the swell from the roll. My heart missed more than one beat when we knew the bream had entered the trap. Would they succumb to my single redworm tipped with maggot, or my friends single redworm tipped with caster?

They were coming into the swim from my friend's side, and his float was the first to slide across the surface and then disappear.  The bream fought well on the relatively light tackle, but luckily it kited to one side and then in a big semi-circle and was landed behind the boat, away from the swim. Even so, I couldn’t help but wonder if the hooking of that fish was going to be enough to spook those that remained. It was a beautiful bream that my friend cradled in his arms just before he slipped it back. It weighed 5kg. But I didn’t have long to dwell on it, for my own float shot under, and my tightening of the line met with that inimitable thumping that all big bream men know and love so much.

It had been less than an hour since we had moored the boat in that swim and ambushed the bream, and in that short space of time we had landed two in double figures, a better result than the night session that had produced nothing more than two line bites. Seeing those bream roll had presented an opportunity, and one that had to be taken advantage of with simple float tackle, for the high-tech bite alarms, rod-pods and other sophisticated gear was out of place in that type of situation, where an attack had to be mounted from a boat at very short notice.

Barbel
Another opportunity presented itself during a visit to a nearby river a few years ago. I intended to fish for chub into darkness, that magic time when chub come alive. I’d arrived far too early though, and had two to three hours to kill before dusk fell, and although it was a mild late autumn day, with the river running as clear as tap water, I decided to tackle up a float rod and fish for small fish for a couple of hours. I threaded a 5lb line through the 13ft match rod (it was the lightest reel line I had with me, with not knowing I’d be fishing for small fish) and tied on a 4lb hook length. Hook was a 16’s, which was the smallest I could get away with for bread fishing, which was the only remotely suitable bait for small fish I had with me. Certainly better than the lobworms, luncheon meat and cheese paste I’d brought along for chub. Float was a straight waggler, bulk shotted at mid-depth, apart from a single shot about a foot from the hook.

I mashed up two slices of bread and sat for about five minutes, just feeding tiny pieces into the head of the 3ft deep glide, hoping to get the small fish well on feed before I attempted to catch any (and it all passed the time away to bring closer the fishing I really wanted to do). Before I picked up the rod to send a bait down I saw a white flash at the tail end of the swim. Great, I thought, they’re onto the bait. So I pinched a tiny piece of flake around the shank of the 16’s and delivered it to the swim. As my float reached the tail end of the swim, when I was obviously looking in that direction, I had a clear view of the next white flash to appear there. That was no small fish. Chub, I thought, and it looked a good size. I retrieved the tackle, and switched the 16’s for a 10’s, tied direct to the 5lb line, and then fed a few more pieces of mash before I tried another cast.

I soon realised they were not chub, they were barbel, lovely bronze barbel, flashing their white bellies as they turned over to get their underslung mouths to the bread that was floating down just a few centimetres under the surface. Why they refused the particles that had sunk, and were trundling along the bottom I’ll never know. Perhaps it was more fun to perform somersaults to get at the bread higher in the water. Who says fish don’t know how to enjoy themselves?

I slid the float down to fish just 2ft deep, and then pushed all the bulk shotting right under the float. The bottom shot remained where it was, which meant it was now mid-way between float and hook. I pinched a piece of flake onto the shank of the hook, and then fed a few more small pieces of mashed bread into the swim, following them down immediately with my hooked offering. It worked like a charm, the barbel were coming up from the bottom so fast to intercept the loose mash they didn’t have time to spot any difference between the loose feed and my hook bait. In the next hour or so, before they either went off feed, or were spooked due to me catching a few of them, I took six barbel from a little over 8lb to a best fish of 11lb. My chub fishing suffered later though, for I had used up all the bread I had with me, and I was certain I would have caught more than the three I did manage to catch if I’d had bread to offer them. Who knows? But I wasn’t complaining.

These days I go better prepared for the unexpected, rarely being without a float rod, and usually with a good selection of baits and various bits and pieces of tackle. You just never know what you’re going to come across, and it’s as well to be prepared for almost anything. The trouble is, all my efforts to lighten the load I carry are more difficult, for everything I pick up with a view to leaving it at home are met with the thought: better not, you never know just what you might............................


Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, 4 July 2010

Floater Fishing For Surface Feeders


Surface fishing  for carp, rudd and trout appeals to me for two reasons: first and foremost it is an exciting and interesting fishing method, and the other thing is that it is riddled with problems which, when solved - if only briefly - offer a tremendous amount of satisfaction.

Fishing floating baits on the surface teaches you a lot about fish, for you can actually watch how they approach a bait. Although the conditions are quite different between the bottom and the surface, much of the fish's behaviour when confronted with a 'suspicious' bait on the top or on the bottom (the refusal, the aborted take, the snatch, and the confident suck) must be almost the same. Which all goes a long way towards teaching you what is going on at times when your bait lies out of sight on the bottom and your indicator tells you that something down there is showing an interest.





My first taste of surface fishing (other than dry-fly for trout, which has always been my favourite form of trout fishing) was with rudd on a small farm pond. I was only a boy at the time, but I distinctly remember, following a spell of float fishing for roach and rudd with my favourite home-made peacock quill floats, throwing in my bread leftovers for the moorhens to devour when I'd left, and seeing half a dozen or so hungry mouths attack the bread as though they were determined to beat the moorhens to it. That probably was part of the reason for the frenzied attack on the bread, for the rudd most likely knew that they had to get in first to stand a chance. What they wouldn't realise was that the moor hens would not make an appearance until I had moved out of earshot.

The other thing about that day that stands out in my mind is that although I had seen the rudd taking bread from the surface on many other occasions, it was only then that the thought entered my head that presenting a surface bait to them could be a good way of catching them! Fishing a slow-sinking bait was the nearest I had come to it before. I determined I would try it on my next visit, which was the next day as it happened. And the simple approach I adopted was to fish exactly as I had before, but with no shot on the line at all between hook and float. From that day I got better and better at catching those rudd off the top; finding the right length of bottom to use; the best hook size; timing of the strike; and how best to loose feed to keep them interested.

It was many years later, sometime in my salad years as a 'specimen hunter', when I went through my next spell of serious rudd hunting, this time on a Cheshire mere that was renowned for good tench and even better rudd. A good tench at the time was 4lb plus, of which the mere had a nice head of them up to 5lb or so, and the rudd went well over 2lb.

The big problem on this fishery was that there was only one short stretch of bank from which to fish, the remainder being a bird sanctuary and out of bounds to anglers. Not surprisingly, it was the far bank where most of the marginal vegetation grew and therefore where the biggest rudd spent most of their time. But when the wind was right they followed it towards the fishable bank; you could see them priming and swirling at the surface as they sucked in spent insects.

To catch the biggest fish still meant a cast of more than 30yds, which ruled out float fishing of any efficiency, and also meant that loose feeding with crusts by catapult was out of the question (Chum Mixer-type biscuits were still being fed to dogs and cats only; fish were yet to have the pleasure).

So the hookbait had to go out via Arlesey Bomb on some kind of leger set-up. And I had to find a way of introducing loose feed.

The rig I decided to use was pretty simple, no more, really, than a modified fixed paternoster. I knew the depth so it was easy to get the rig set up correctly without a great deal of trial and error. To this day I have yet to find a better method of surface fishing at long range, providing the water is no deeper than about 6ft. Any deeper and sliding/running rigs have to be employed, which are fine if there are no algae particles floating around, which can foul up swivel eyes and make hard work of everything.

The beauty of the rig is that it is so easy to fish the bait at any exact depth you choose simply by allowing the bait to lie on the surface, and then hauling it down by pulling on the line at the butt ring and attaching a heavy bobbin at the bottom of the loop as soon as the depth you wish to fish at is reached. The bobbin has to be just heavy enough to stop the crust from rising again - what carp anglers call critically balanced. That way the rudd have only to sniff at the bait and the bobbin will begin to rise. I think this is a very significant factor towards the success of this method, for if a rudd shows an interest in the bait, if only swirling close to it, the crust begins to rise towards the surface; in effect behaving very naturally indeed, and simply asking to be grabbed before a competitor snatches the morsel from under its nose. The bigger the bait you use (within reason) the more easily it is controlled and therefore the more efficient the technique becomes.

Carp Taking Floaters Unsuccessfully 002Image by Graham Marsden via Flickr
The method is equally successful with carp, although you need at least two Chum Mixer and some rig foam to make it work. Crust too, if you can find a water where the carp will still take it!


I solved the problem of feeding crusts at long range by mixing dry crusts in with a few balls of groundbait. The groundbait was mixed so that it dissolved quite rapidly on the bottom and released the crusts to rise to the surface. I packed as many crusts into the groundbait balls as I could get away with.

The bottom line was that it worked like a dream; both the method and the feeding technique, and I caught plenty of rudd to almost 3lbs over a period of several weeks.

My first efforts at surface fishing for carp also led me to a method I still use to this day, only slightly modified from the original rig.

As usual, I began by catching a fair number of carp on a freelined crust, and then, when the carp had travelled the learning curve, found I was watching them take all the free offerings and perhaps just one of the hooked ones before they spooked. Close observation revealed though, that they were being crafty and knocking the hooked crust about enough to cause crumbs to fall off it and sink towards the bottom, which they grabbed on the way down.

So I tied up a two-hook rig which had a big hook on the surface carrying a big crust, and a smaller hook 4ins below it carrying a piece of pinched flake simulating a piece that was sinking from the crust. They fell for it hook, line, and particularly the sinker!

I was concerned for some time that the rig could lead to some damage to a hooked fish; the loose hook fouling a snag and tethering the fish to it. But I was using it in a snag-free water and never did have any trouble. I would be wary of this, however, and think carefully before you use the rig. Also, be wary of the fish thrashing in the landing net, causing the loose hook to snag the mesh. What I do is immediately cut off the loose hook before I place the landing net down on the unhooking mat. Tying on a new hook-length is a small price to pay for being able to use an effective method without risk of damaging the fish.

The floater-fishing method I use most of the time today is the straightforward controller approach, although I accept that controllers often spook the carp as much as anything. No controller and watching the bait through binoculars is no doubt the best method of bite detection, and can't be faulted when you know carp are showing in your baited area, but there is no way I want a pair of binoculars stuck to my eyes for hours on end waiting for that bite 'out of the blue'.

Like so many other types of fishing though, the way you loose feed can make the difference between success and failure. My way is to choose a position where I have my back to the wind and loose feed with trout pellet and hookbait samples (usually Chum Mixer) in the same way I would loose feed with maggot or caster when fishing stick float on the river. Little and often is the answer, or quite a lot and often if you are fishing a prolific carp water, for they can mop up a hell of a lot of feed if they're well onto it. Whichever - little and often, or a lot and often - the aim is to keep a constant stream of bait bobbing along the surface, to such an extent the carp grow over-confident and therefore careless. Feeding for twenty minutes or so before you actually wet a hookbait is the best way, which allows the carp to grow confident before any of them are hauled off to a landing net, and therefore remain confident for longer.

If you get the feeding technique right, on the right day, you can hook the carp on almost any floater method, within reason of course. They become so preoccupied with feeding, and competing with each other if you get enough carp in the area, their sense of self-preservation goes out of the window to a great extent. Ask any match angler, he'll tell you that correct feeding technique is more than half the battle.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, 3 July 2010

Trout in the Hot Sun


 Yesterday, me, Dave and Ed decided we'd risk a day's fly fishing on my local Loynton Trout Fishery, near Eccleshall, Staffordshire.

Risk? Well, the weather suggested we wouldn't catch anything, for if there's one thing that rainbow trout hate its hot, bright sunshine and warm water. And yesterday we had the lot - in spades.

Even the staff that manage the fishery were honest, telling us that there was very little chance of us catching anything. But what the hell, in for a penny in for a pound, 20 of them to be exact, which is the cost of a sporting ticket which means you can catch and release fish but not take any away. I paid an extra fiver to allow me to take two fish, not because I felt any more confident than Ed and Dave, but an old lady had asked me to try to catch her a nice trout for her tea. If nothing else, it gave me an extra incentive to beat the blank that everyone thought was inevitable for the three of us.

Now anyone who knows me will know that I'm no purist, so I had no hesitation but to fish with a bright yellow blob under a bung, something I very rarely start with as I prefer to try to catch something with more traditional methods, only shortening the odds with a fly under a bung either when I've run out of other ideas or towards the end of the day when I just want to sit and 'float fish'.

I fished the blob at a depth of 5ft and within minutes had a trout of about 2.5lb in the net. Dave and Ed struggled on for a few more minutes before Ed gave in and went on the same method, although he did try different flies before ending up on a yellow blob. Dave, stubborn bugger, carried on for most of the day with traditional methods until in the end even he gave up.

Too late though, as they both returned a blank, just like everyone else who fished that day. I had another trout, this one a much nicer looking fish and weighing about 3.5lb.

 So I was happy, the old lady was happy with her two nice trout, and Ed and Dave were happy anyway, as it was such a nice day just to be out and fishing, regardless of the outcome.

Loynton has a very nice Orvis shop, but none of us bought anything, honest (you never know who reads these things do you?).



Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, 1 July 2010

From the Archives - Summer Chubbing on a Small River

Eric Barnes has always been famous for lobs.  When he played professional football for Cheshire’s Crewe Alexander FC for 12 years as centre-half  he lobbed plenty of balls in - and out - of penalty areas. That was many moons ago. But now he’s well known for another kind of lob - lobworms, his favourite bait for many species, but especially for summer chub.

I’ve known and fished with Eric for more than 20 years, and there is no doubt that he’s something of an expert when it comes to fishing with lobworm.  So I thought it would be interesting if we had a day’s summer chubbing together, he using his favourite lob, and me one of favourite baits for chub in the summer months: slug - those big black or brown snot-balls which are a favourite dish of chub everywhere.

Our own local river Dane was the chosen venue, a small river that meanders through the Cheshire countryside with so many twists and turns. It really is a river full of character, with all the features you could wish for, including fast shallows, deep glides, undercut banks, rubbish rafts, and with banks dripping with willows and other vegetation that all go towards making fishing magical, and not just a pastime where catching fish is all that matters.

When I go summer chubbing I want it to be summer chubbing, with the sun blazing down from a clear blue sky on a water that is running low and clear.  That may sound daft, for they are not the best of conditions for fishing; not normally anyhow, but when you’re throwing slugs and lobs to chub in water that has been warmed by a summer sun it seems as though they the best conditions.  I know I enjoy the fishing when it’s like that, and while the chub are not often keen to chase after bread and luncheon meat beneath a bright sky, in tap-clear water, they rarely refuse slugs and lobs.

So Eric and I were not disappointed when we met at the river not long after first light, with the sun already hauling itself over the horizon into a sky that hadn’t a cloud to call its own.  Though to see me walking over the first meadow with my head hanging down you would have thought I carried all the troubles of the world on my shoulders.  Not so, I’d had a hard time finding slugs the day before, and I was looking for more in the dew-damp grass as I walked to the river.  In fact, the ones I had found were on the small side, and although I was confident I would catch on them, I much preferred the real big ones that go three inches in length and as fat as your thumb.  I found one or two slugs as I crossed the field, but still no real big ones.  Then Eric gave a gleeful cry and stooped to pick up a shiny black object, which he hastily dropped like a hot brick and wiped his hand down the side of his waterproof overtrousers.  That’ll teach him not to wear his glasses, I thought, sheep turds look just like big black slugs!

We decided that I would walk the length of the mile-long stretch and begin fishing at the far end, while Eric would start at the beginning.  When our paths crossed somewhere in the middle section we would compare notes.  I left Eric and made my way across the fields, torn between looking at the river for fish and watching the ground for slugs.  Believe me, I was sorely tempted more than once to drop in a swim before I got to the end of the stretch, so inviting did some of the swims look.  But I resisted the temptation - just!  The walk, though, was most enjoyable, for this is part of the pleasure of summer chubbing, you carry the minimum amount of tackle so that you are comfortably mobile.

At the limit of this length of the Dane is a wood, where a sharp bend forms a pool on the near bank.  In winter the pool, which is about 6ft deep, fishes well.  Now, in the warmer months, I knew that the sand bar, that sloped up from the pool to the far bank, would be favourite, for the chub love to get the sun on their backs - providing there are no menacing silhouettes or footfalls on the bank to drive them back into the deeper, darker water.  I put the rod together out of sight of the swim and slipped under the barbed-wire fence (I preferred to go under rather than over, being short in the leg and not wanting to sing falsetto all the way home) and sat behind a big clump of nettles. With clip-on polarising glasses attached I stared at the sandy bottom, willing my eyes to adjust. Yes, two grey shadows slid out of the dark water, half way across the sand bar, and hovered in the current, quickly followed by two more, smaller fish. The first two looked about 2lb to 3lb apiece, which is average for this part of the Dane.

Using forceps, I clamped hold of a slug and slipped the hook through its tail, a black juice oozing out of the penetration points.  Not very pleasant, but undoubtedly a lot to do with the attraction slugs have for chub.  With three SSG shot pinched directly on the line about a foot from the hook, I cast upstream, three yards higher than the chub, with the intention of watching the slug trundle down to where the chub hovered.  It didn’t.  So I reeled in, dug a thumb-nail into the split and removed one SSG, casting to the same spot again.  This time the slug did what I wanted it to, and hopped slowly over the sand, right into the big gob of one of the smaller chub. Whack!  The quiver-tip bent round, followed by the top section of the rod, before I could react and halt the fish in its tracks. If I hadn’t seen the fish, and not landed it, I would have sworn it was a lot bigger than it was. But that’s slug fishing for chub. When they want it, they have it, and they don’t mess around, giving some of the most violent bites you'll ever witness.


I slipped the fish back and made off for the next swim. It wasn’t the kind of swim you could disturb and expect the chub to feed again for another half hour or so.

At the next swim was a big old crack willow that leaned and threatened to fall into the river, but which was handy for me to use as cover as I  looked for chub in this narrow section. The far bank was undercut, only about 4ft deep, but dark and reassuring under the thick bushes that overhung the water.  The bottom shelved to my own bank, over sand and gravel.  A slug was hung onto the 6’s hook by its tail and cast deep into the undercut, the two SSG not heavy enough to grip bottom, which was exactly what I wanted.  A second cast, then a third, the slug tripping out of the dark water and over the sand, and not a chub in sight. The fourth cast, a little further downstream, where a raft of twigs had gathered, produced two small plucks on the quivertip, but the slug remained intact.

Another cast produced the same result.  Very small chub, or dace, I thought, and cast again. This time I held the line with the rod pointing at the bait, feeling for the bite. Sure enough, I felt the line tighten slightly, so I fed it some slack, and the next thing I knew the line had been snatched from my fingers and the rod was bucking as a chub of 3lb or so struggled to stay in the water. It failed and slid over the net looking sorry for itself, not even a free meal for its trouble, for the slug had been spit up the line. (Although chub bites on slugs are usually very aggressive, it doesn't mean you can take that fact for granted!).

I fished a few more swims, including two that were no more than a foot deep, flowing quite rapidly over bright green streamer weed, where the chub chased the slug as it rolled across the bottom and beneath the weed. I caught 14 chub in all, but didn’t get one bigger than about 3 1/2lb.

I found Eric another 100yds upstream, casting a lobworm to a swim behind a branch that stuck out of the water.

"I’ve had 13 chub, but nothing over 3lb. I don’t know where all the bigger ones are today.  It’s as though they’ve disappeared. I’ve had a lot of trouble with dace chewing the worms to mincemeat, and even caught a nice one of 1/2lb or so that managed to hang itself on a 6’s hook.

"I tried freelining, but all the swims that produced chub were too fast to fish without any weight. I’ve had most of my fish from runs between weedbeds, and had six chub from one swim that must have had a big shoal in the weed. If I hadn’t got snagged so often I would have had a lot more from that swim.

"Most of the bites were just little plucks on the quivertip, no more of a movement than the bites I was getting from the dace. That’s what’s made it hard really, for half the time I didn’t know whether to leave it, thinking it was dace, or to strike in case it was a chub.  I’ve enjoyed it though, it was nice just being here today. The fish were a bonus."


Eric broke his rod down and we headed for the cars.  As we passed a shallow, weedy swim we spotted a few chub gliding from one weedbed to the other.  My rod was still made up, and Eric said, "Lend me your rod a sec."  He took his bait box from his bag and impaled a large lob onto the 6’s hook, slid down to the edge of the river and cast the lob in the run between the weed.  Immediately, the rod bucked and he was into a fish, a chub that kicked up quite a fuss in the shallow water.  It weighed about...........2lb!

"That makes us even," Eric said, grinning, "Fourteen chub each."

"Oh no it doesn’t," I replied. "You used my rod, so that’s half each in my book, 14 ½ for me and 13 ½ for you!"

Graham’s Set-up
I used a home-made 11ft quivertip rod and a Mitchell Excellence 40 reel loaded with 6lb Maxima line to a 4.6lb Bayer Ultima hook length. Hook was a size 6 Mustad Limerick, No. 36876, which is matt black and goes nicely with a black slug in clear water. I used at least one SSG shot directly on the line, but added more if the swim demanded it. Fishing the shot directly on the line, when fishing in a current, is just as sensitive as a running link - if you use only just enough shot to present the bait exactly right.  Fishing two or more SSG direct on the line when float fishing is no different than using two SSG when legering, providing the whole set-up is well balanced.
I don’t like the freeline rig - which means there is nothing on the line except the hook and bait - unless I can actually see the fish taking the bait. The fish have too much free line to play with when there is no weight on the line, and can move the bait in some instances without registering a bite. A single SSG shot can make all the difference, for it gives the rig an anchoring, or fulcrum point, so that they have only the length of the hooklength to play with, rather than all that line from the hook to the bite indicator.
A main line of 6lb test is heavier than necessary for chub on the Dane, but I use 6lb for the simple reason that the Dane boasts one or two decent barbel. If I spot one of these when I’m chubbing it is a simple matter of removing the lighter hooklength and tying a hook direct to the 6lb line, giving me a good chance of landing a barbel.

Eric’s Set-up
Eric used one of the old type Shakespeare President quivertip rods, an ABU Cardinal 55 reel, 6lb Maxima reel line, 5lb Maxima hooklength, to a size 6 Mustad No. 34021 carp hook. He tried freelining without success, so used a 6in silicon running link, which had a link-swivel at one end to facilitate a quick change of bomb. Hooklength was attached via a swivel, which also acted as a leger stop, the knot protected by a bead.

Tackle Essentials
The beauty of summer chubbing is that you need carry no more tackle than the average fly angler. In fact, I use a fly fisherman’s shoulder bag (see pic above). In the bag is a small tackle box containing hooks of various sizes, a spare spool of 4lb line for the reel, a couple of spools of line for hooklengths, usually 3.6 and 4.6 test. A disgorger, forceps, box of SSG shot, and a selection of bombs in case the current is racing through and I need to go heavier. Another small box contains all those bits and pieces we use: beads, swivels, link-swivels, silicon tube, plastic leger stops, float adapters, small brass rings, etc, etc. The bag also holds a bait box of slugs, one with lobs, and a few slices of bread - just in case!  Though I find I rarely need the lobs, and specially not the bread.

Other than that the bag holds a flask and sandwiches; not compulsory, but it’s good to have a sit down with a brew and a butty and do nothing but look at the river. Finally, a tackled-up rod, landing net and rod rest completes the requirements. Other extras you could consider are a set of scales and weighbag, and in my case I sling a camera over my shoulder.

Where clothing is concerned, unless it is especially hot, I wear a waterproof bib and brace to keep my legs dry in the dew-laden grass of early morning, and so that I can sit anywhere on the banks without getting my bum wet, and not have to worry about carrying a waterproof sheet. The bib and brace is good because it leaves my arms free and it’s easy to slip on and off if the weather is changeable. A pair of leather boots are most comfortable for the feet, but Derry boots and the like are okay if it’s wet or muddy underfoot. A hat with a peak can be handy when the sun is bright, and a pair of polarising glasses make it a lot easier to spot fish.

Collecting, Storing and Hooking Slugs
If you’re going to be a regular ‘slugger’ the best way to ensure a steady supply is to place some sacking in a damp, dark area of your garden, or other suitable piece of ground.  Keep the sacking damp and let it rot.  Slugs will almost always be found underneath it.  Other than that, search any grassy areas following a shower of rain in the night.  I’m not particularly squeamish, so it doesn’t bother me to pick slugs up with my fingers, but they do leave your fingers a sticky mess, so use forceps, being careful not to squeeze the slugs too tightly.

I store my slugs in damp newspaper in a bait box, and find they last for several days.  Then, if I have any left, I let them go and collect fresh ones.

I always begin fishing by hooking slugs through the tail, about a ¼ inch from the end, but if I start to get violent takes, but not hooking anything, I then thread the hook through the tail, about a ¼ inch from the end again, pull through, and back in close to the head of the slug.  I very rarely find it’s necessary to use a hook smaller than a 6’s.

Collecting, Storing and Hooking Lobworms
The best way of collecting lobworms is to wait until a couple of hours or so after dark, and get out on a lawn. Use a torch with a dim beam (cover the glass with a tissue or two, held on with an elastic band) and look for lobs that will be lying on top of the grass, probably with their tail still down the hole. Grasp them firmly, close to the hole, and apply a steady pressure. Don’t be impatient and yank at them or they’ll snap in two.  After a second or two they’ll slide out as easy as you like. Drop them in a bait box filled with damp, shredded newspaper, or damp sphagnum moss, which is also the best medium for storing them for a few weeks.

Never put pieces of worm in the box, or worms with any kind of damage. They just kill the rest of your stock. Always check for dead and dying worms regularly and throw them out. Hook lobworms about a third of the way down from the head or tail, threading the hook through until it is completely buried except for the point and barb.




Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, 30 June 2010

Deceit in the Digital Age

The digital age has breathed new life into photography, at least as far as convenience is concerned, but there will always be photographers who take pictures and people who take snaps. That will never alter no matter how much the equipment progresses for the photographer has an 'eye' for a good shot. The big change, apart from the technology itself, is that the digital era has put photography into the hands of the masses; now almost everyone has a digital camera even if it is no more than a camera phone.

Digital photography with a top of the range, multi megapixel SLR camera is now also very close to the quality of 35mm transparency film. You would be hard pressed to tell the difference between a shot taken with the different media even at poster size and the bulk of the photographs you see in magazines will have been taken with a digital camera. We’re awash with pictures, and they can be sent around the world via email almost as fast as you can say ‘smile please’. With just a little knowledge of how to take a decent picture it’s difficult to take a poor one, and when you check the results in the monitor you simply delete those that are not up to scratch and just take them again. No wasted film, no processing costs. And as if that wasn’t enough we have a glut of inexpensive image editing software around these days that can change a poor shot into a work of art. Microsoft Windows Vista and Windows 7 operating systems have it all built in, so the ability to edit images is more convenient and easier than ever.

But that’s the rub, for image editing will be even more open to abuse by those who wish to deceive. And believe me, there are more than a few deceivers around, and some have quite a talent for it. In some cases you would never know the difference between a manufactured picture and the genuine article unless you had access to the original and knew exactly what to look for.
Take a look at the first image of me with a chub. How big? It certainly looks big enough to win a wad of cash and a weekly award.

Now look at the second image, which is the unedited and genuine shot of the fish. I can't actually remember what it weighed but it was less than 5lb.

The edited and false image of the chub took me just a few minutes to do in Photoshop, and it wouldn't pass scrutiny by anyone who cared to take a close look at it. But it gives you a good idea of what could be done by someone who knows how to use the software and spent more time perfecting it.

One of the easiest things to do is to take an element from one image and drop it into another image. Where fishing pictures are concerned this usually means cutting a fish from one picture and dropping it into the hands of an angler in another picture. Get the sizing right and the fish of course looks much bigger than it really is. Another trick used by the cheats is the ‘angler’ who cuts an image of himself holding a fish from one shot and pastes it into an image of a lake or riverside scene, thereby making it look like the fish was caught from quite a different location to where it really was caught. Quite recently one ‘angler’ openly suggested in print that to do so was a good way of disguising where you were catching your fish. Obviously oblivious to, or not caring, that to do such a thing would put pressure on someone else’s water. Knowing the ‘angler’ like I do I’m sure it was the latter.

It’s prudent to ask why. Why do some anglers wish to behave in that way? The out and out crooks are obviously doing it for the money and the prizes that some angling publications offer. That, in a perverted kind of way, is possibly more understandable than the anglers who do it for the glory and for no other reason than they’re just by nature deceitful and dishonest. Why can’t it be enough to just take the photograph with an unrecognisable background, or with a brolly or a bivvie in the background? And it’s easy enough to take the picture from a high angle so that all that is visible, apart from the angler and fish, is grass. The only conclusion you can come to is that there are some people who actually enjoy the dishonest and deceitful subterfuge.

Worse are those anglers who are total hypocrites. One in particular I’ve been unfortunate enough to run into on more than one occasion has criticised more people than I care to remember for publishing photos of fish they’ve caught where he’s been able to recognise a blade of grass or two. He’s caused more trouble for his fellow anglers and the club he belonged to than anyone else I know. I’ll never forget the day we had a toe to toe argument on the Dove when he accused me of publishing a picture of the stretch that showed a club sign (which was a lie) and telling me I wasn’t being fair on the others who fished there. Now he’s no longer a member of that particular club he’s publishing pictures on a regular basis that show swims in detail. And then he wonders why he’s known as Billy Nomates and why nobody believes a word he says. Thankfully, the real truth is slowly emerging and he fools fewer people as each day passes.

So what can we do about this dishonest image manipulation? One thing I would suggest is that editors really scrutinise the images they’re sent. It’s not too difficult to spot editing that goes beyond simple image enhancement. A couple of months or so ago I took a copy of one of our weeklies to a FishingMagic fish-in and indicated a few points in a barbel picture sent in by our ‘friend’. Within a few seconds the dozen or so lads (and lassie) could see where the fish had been pasted and blended none too skilfully into another shot.

Of course, someone who is more adept at image editing would be able to produce an image that would pass scrutiny, so what the answer is then I don’t really know. I suppose in many ways it doesn’t matter, for any system that relies solely on photographic evidence has to accept that it is wide open to the sharks who will take advantage. And yet the organisation that should be as foolproof as is practicably possible, the British Record Fish Committee, does accept photographic evidence!

I’m not particularly cynical by nature, but some of the images I see in some of our publications cause me to smile wryly at the very least, and others cause me to roar with derisive laughter. Not always due to dishonest manipulation but for the claims made for the fish in the photograph. Apart from those sad people who do this to make a profit, and the even more sad people who do it for some kind of recognition, or to help sell a product, I do wonder what kind of life they’ve led that has brought them to such a low ebb they need to fabricate fish catches, either through direct lying or photo editing. A few anglers are so paranoid about being second best on the waters they fish they’ll stoop to any level to appear to be on top.

They’re fish for God’s sake, and many of the fish we catch most of the time are largely the result of good luck rather than good judgement. The cheating toe rags should get a life, grow up and stop being so bloody pathetic.



Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, 29 June 2010

Fishing & Photography

Two Great Hobbies Combined

One of the lesser known advantages of being an angler are the beautiful locations in which you can find yourself. I've been to some fabulous looking venues both here and abroad. So it's a double whammy for me as my second (often my first) hobby is photography and it's great to be able to combine the two.

Keen semi-pro and amateur photographers like myself are likely to have a digital SLR camera, but that doesn't mean you can't get some great shots with a digital compact.And let's face it, if you only want to print up to A4 and for web or PC monitor use, you don't really need anything else.

Self-take Photography

Photography has long been a second hobby for many anglers, especially those who take an interest in the landscapes and wildlife they share their surroundings with. Many of those who have no interest in photography carry a camera, if only to have a record of the good fish they've caught. And in these days of fully automatic digital cameras and camera phones even more anglers are taking pictures of the fish they've caught. When you fish with other anglers nearby, whether they're companions or not, there is no problem getting a good shot as you just ask someone to bang off a few shots and usually at least one will be of decent quality.

The problems start when you fish on your own and there is no one nearby to take the shot for you. In that situation you have to have some means of taking the picture yourself that doesn't involve keeping the fish out of the water for too long. Most anglers choose to use a camera with a self-timer or, better still, a remote control and support the camera on a tripod or a bankstick fitted with a camera adaptor. They minimise the time the fish spends out of the water by setting up a space between two banksticks, switching off the autofocus and manually pre-focusing on the banksticks from a predetermined spot.

When a fish is caught it is then a simple job to place the fish on an unhooking mat between the banksticks, set the camera up on the predetermined spot, set the self-timer going, and nip smartly into position between the banksticks to hold the fish in time for the shutter to go off. If you have a camera that is capable of taking a burst of three or more shots then that's a distinct advantage if you bracket the exposures. And better still is if you have a remote controlled camera that will allow you to hold the fish comfortably and pose with eyes open and a smile on your face before you release the shutter. Even better is if you have a camera with a swivel screen so that you can see what the camera is seeing. The Canon G11 is excellent for this, but there are other makes and models that also have the facility.

Camera tripods have always been a problem for anglers as the most stable ones are too heavy to lug around when you have to walk any distance to your swim. A solid, screw-in bankstick with a camera adaptor, is a good idea but still not ideal when fishing on very hard ground or even rocks, and when you want to move the camera around a little.

What I use is the Joby Gorillapod which come in various sizes to the suit the type of camera you use. It is lighter than the lightest bankstick, can be used on the ground like a standard tripod, or attached to practically anything, such as trees, bushes, fences, pipes, even rocks. Used on the ground it's low down but that is easily solved by tilting the camera upwards. Most of the time though anglers will have a convenient fence or tree branch to attach it to. Combine the Gorillapod with the Gardner Camera Angle Adaptor, or similar, and you have a great, versatile, camera support that takes up hardly any room in your rucksack or box and weighs just a few ounces.


Enhanced by Zemanta